OnTheIssuesLogo

Dean Heller on Corporations

Republican

 


Against bank bailout; against Dodd-Frank bank regulation

Both Heller and Berkley said it was a mistake to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, which made it easier for banks to expand. But they differed on the banking reforms recently passed. Heller mentioned he was the only member of the Nevada delegation to vote against the bank bailout. He called the Dodd-Frank bank regulation bill "cover for those who voted for the bank bailout." Berkley called her opponent "Mr. Deregulation."
Source: Las Vegas Sun on 2012 Nevada Senate debates , Oct 11, 2012

Voted NO on letting shareholders vote on executive compensation.

Congressional Summary:

Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act: Amends the Securities Exchange Act to require that any proxy for an annual shareholders meeting provide for a separate shareholder vote to approve executive compensation for named executive officers. The shareholder vote shall not be:

  1. binding on the corporation
  2. construed as overruling a board decision, or as creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty by the board; or
  3. construed as restricting or limiting shareholder ability to place executive compensation proposals within proxy materials.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:Rep. BARNEY FRANK (D, MA-4): The amount of wages is irrelevant to the SEC. What this bill explicitly aims at is the practice whereby people are given bonuses that pay off if the gamble pays off, but don't lose you anything if it doesn't. That is, there is a wide consensus that this incentivizes excessive risk.

Opponent's argument to vote No:Rep. SPENCER BACHUS (R, AL-6): True, the first 6 pages of the bill give the owners, the shareholders, a non-binding vote on the pay of top executives. But then come the next 8 pages, the switch, which gives the regulators the power to decide appropriate compensation for not only just top executives but for all employees of all financial institutions above $1 billion in assets and all without regard for the shareholders' prior approval. So under the guise of empowering shareholders, it is, in fact, the government that is empowered. And, finally, on page 15, the bill designates those same government entities which regulated AIG, Countrywide, and collectively failed to prevent the worst financial calamity since the Great Depression. This bill continues the Democrat majority's tendency to go to the default solution for every problem: create a government bureaucracy to make decisions better left to private citizens and private corporations.

Reference: Say-On-Pay Bill; Bill H.R.3269 ; vote number 2009-H686 on Jul 31, 2009

Voted YES on more funding for nanotechnology R&D and commercialization.

Congressional Summary:Extends funding for research and development topics, nanotechnology, project commercialization, prioritization of applications, and federal administration and oversight.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:Rep. NYDIA VELÁZQUEZ (D, NY-12): We need jobs that cannot be shipped overseas and will not evaporate in the next cycle of boom and bust. But those jobs aren't going to appear out of thin air. They need to be created. By expanding existing industries and unlocking new ones, H.R. 2965 will generate the jobs we need. Job creation is the primary goal of R&D. But in order to generate new positions, we have to first develop new industries. Commercialization is critical to that process.

Opponent's argument to vote No:Rep. ED MARKEY (D, MA-7): I must oppose this bill because I have serious concerns about allowing SBIR awards to go to an unlimited number of businesses owned or controlled by venture capital (VC) firms. The SBIR program, responsible for over 60,000 patents, has always focused on innovation from truly small businesses for whom commercial capital market funding is typically not an option. However, with the change made in this bill, the SBIR program would be wide open to applicants that already are well-capitalized due to VC participation, crowding out the small businesses that have been the focus of the highly successful SBIR program.

While I support VC participation in the SBIR program, enabling an unlimited amount of large VC majority-owned firms to qualify for SBIR funding calls into question whether this program, intended for genuinely small businesses, is, in fact, still focused on these firms.

We should do everything in our power to strengthen small businesses that generate 70% of new jobs in our country. H.R 2965 does not do enough to ensure that small businesses are the focus of the SBIR program, and therefore I cannot support the bill.

Reference: Enhancing Small Business Research and Innovation Act; Bill S.1233&H.R.2965 ; vote number 2009-H486 on Jul 8, 2009

Voted YES on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation.

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation [and as part of that process, fully disclosing executive compensation].

Proponents support voting YES because:

We should not deprive the public, the stockholders, from being able to do anything meaningful once they find out about scandalous levels of executive compensation or board compensation. Everyone talks about the corporate board as the remedy. But the board is often a part of the problem, being paid huge amounts of money for showing up once or twice a year at meetings.

Give the stockholders a meaningful remedy. Once you get the mandatory disclosure put in place by previous legislation, we are saying the stockholders should be allowed to have a referendum on that and not have a runaround by the board.

Opponents support voting NO because:

This vote is based on mischaracterization--it is an unnecessary amendment. The opportunity for these kinds of votes already exists within the structure of corporate governance right now. A good company from Georgia, AFLAC, went ahead and already has these nonbinding shareholder votes. But there is a difference between having individuals in the private sector, shareholders and individuals outside of the mandating of government to have it occur and have government come in with its heavy hand and say, this is exactly what you need to do because we know best. Our constituents know better how to act and how to relate to corporations than Washington.

Reference: Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act; Bill H R 1257 ; vote number 2007-244 on Apr 20, 2007

Repeal ObamaCare reporting requirements for small business.

Heller co-sponsored Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act

A BILL To repeal the expansion of information reporting requirements for payments of $600 or more to corporations. Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the amendments made thereby, are hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and amendments, had never been enacted. [This is the first attempt at dismantling ObamaCare by pieces, as opposed to H.R. 2 which dismantles ObamaCare in whole. The proposed section of the ObamaCare law to be repealed appears below. --OnTheIssues editor].

Source: HR144&HR4 11-HR004 on Jan 12, 2011

Rated 0% by UFCW, indicating a pro-management voting record.

Heller scores 0% by UFCW on labor-management issues

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) is North America's Neighborhood Union--1.3 million members with UFCW locals in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our members work in supermarkets, drug stores, retail stores, meatpacking and meat processing plants, food processing plants, and manufacturing workers who make everything from fertilizer to shoes. We number over 60,000 strong with 25,000 workers in chemical production and 20,000 who work in garment and textile industries.

    The UFCW House scorecard is based on these key votes:
  1. (+) Extension of Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
  2. (+) H. Am. 877 Bishop Am. to HR 3094, penalties for lawsuits against unionization
  3. (+) H. Am. 880 Jackson-Lee Am. to HR 3094, preventing delays in union votes
  4. (-) Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act, freezing public salaries
  5. (-) Regulation from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act, for less corporate regulation
  6. (-) Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act
  7. (-) Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act, letting CEOs fire union organizers
Source: UFCW website 12-UFCW-H on May 2, 2012

Rated 50% by UFCW, indicating a mixed management/labor voting record.

Heller scores 50% by UFCW on labor-management issues

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) is North America's Neighborhood Union--1.3 million members with UFCW locals in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our members work in supermarkets, drug stores, retail stores, meatpacking and meat processing plants, food processing plants, and manufacturing workers who make everything from fertilizer to shoes. We number over 60,000 strong with 25,000 workers in chemical production and 20,000 who work in garment and textile industries.

    The UFCW Senate scorecard is based on these key votes:
  1. American Jobs Act (+)
  2. Balanced Budget Amendment (-)
  3. Rejecting Cut, Cap, and Balance (+)
  4. Repeal Health Care Law (-)
  5. Sen. Am. 14 Wicker Am. to S 223, excluding unionization at TSA (-)
  6. Sen. Am. 740 McCain Am. to HR 2112, defunding TAA (-)
  7. Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act (TAA) (+)
Source: UFCW website 12-UFCW-S on May 2, 2012

Regulatory relief for smaller banks stimulates growth.

Heller voted YEA Banking Bill

Congressional Summary:

Supporting press release from Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN-6): This legislation will foster economic growth by providing relief to Main Street, tailor regulations for better efficacy, and most importantly it will empower individual Americans and give them more opportunity.

Opposing statement on ProPublica.org from Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY-5): The bill includes many provisions I support: minority-owned banks and credit unions in underserved communities have legitimate regulatory burden concerns. Unfortunately, exempting mortgage disclosures enacted to detect discriminatory practices will only assist the Trump Administration in its overall effort to curtail important civil rights regulations. I simply cannot vote for any proposal that would help this Administration chip away at laws that I and my colleagues worked so hard to enact and preserve.

Legislative outcome: Passed House 258-159-10 on May 22, 2018(Roll call 216); Passed Senate 67-31-2 on March 14, 2018(Roll call 54); Signed by President Trump. May 24, 2018

Source: Congressional vote 16-S2155 on Mar 14, 2018

Reduce corporate tax rates from 35% to 21% to create jobs.

Heller voted YEA Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Summary by GovTrack.US: (Nov 16, 2017)

Case for voting YES by Heritage Foundation (12/19/17):This is the most sweeping update to the US tax code in more than 30 years. The bill would lower taxes on businesses and individuals and unleash higher wages, more jobs, and untold opportunity through a larger and more dynamic economy. The bill includes many pro-growth features, including a deep reduction in the corporate tax rate, a scaled-back state and local tax deduction, full expensing for five years, and lower individual tax rates.

Case for voting NO by Sierra Club (11/16/17): Republicans have passed a deeply regressive tax plan that will result in painful cuts to core domestic programs, to give billionaires and corporate polluters tax cuts while making American families pay the price. Among the worst provisions:

  • This plan balloons the federal deficit by over $1.5 trillion. Cutting taxes for the rich now means cuts to the federal budget and entitlements later.
  • The bill hampers the booming clean energy economy by ending tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and for wind and solar energy.
  • The bill opens up the Arctic Refuge to drilling, a thinly veiled giveaway to the fossil fuel industry.

    Legislative outcome: Passed House, 224-201-7, roll call #699 on 12/20; passed Senate 51-48-1, roll call #323 on 12/20; signed by Pres. Trump on 12/22.

    Source: Congressional vote 17-HR1 on Nov 16, 2017

    Other governors on Corporations: Dean Heller on other issues:
    [Title7]
    Gubernatorial Debates 2021:
    CA Recall:
    S.D.Mayor Kevin_Faulconer(R)
    vs.Former Gov. nominee John Cox(R)
    vs.Former U.S.Rep Doug Ose(R)
    vs.Laura Smith(R)
    vs.Former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner(R)
    vs.Radio Host Larry Elder(R)
    vs.Kevin Paffrath(D)
    vs.Gavin Newsom(D)
    NJ: Incumbent Phil Murphy(D)
    vs.State Rep. Jack Ciattarelli(R)
    vs.Candidate Hirsh Singh(R)
    vs.GOP Chair Doug Steinhardt(R)
    VA: Incumbent Ralph Northam(D,term-limited)
    vs.Former Governor Terry McAuliffe(D)
    vs.CEO Glenn Youngkin(R)
    vs.A.G. Mark Herring(D)
    vs.State Sen. Amanda Chase(I)
    vs.Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax(D)
    vs.State Rep. Jennifer Carroll Foy(D)
    vs.State Rep. Lee Carter(D)
    vs.State Sen. Jennifer McClellan(D)
    vs.State Rep. Kirk Cox(R)
    vs.CEO Pete Snyder(R)

    Gubernatorial Debates 2023:
    KY: Incumbent Andy Beshear(D)
    vs.Former Gov. Matt Bevin(? R)

    vs.Senator Rand Paul(? R)
    vs.State Auditor Mark Harmon(R)
    LA: Incumbent John Bel Edwards(D,term-limited)
    vs.Biden Adviser Cedric Richmond(? D)
    vs.Senator John Neely Kennedy(? R)
    MS: Incumbent Tate Reeves(R)
    vs.Bill Waller(R)

    Gubernatorial Debates 2022:
    AK: Incumbent Mike Dunleavy(R)
    vs.Bill Walker(I)
    vs.Les Gara(D)
    vs.Billy Toien(L)
    AL: Incumbent Kay Ivey(R)
    vs.Chris Countryman(D)
    AR: Incumbent Asa Hutchinson(R,term-limited)
    vs.Trump Adviser Sarah Huckabee Sanders(R)
    vs.A.G. Leslie Rutledge(R,withdrew Nov.2021)
    vs.Ricky Dale Harrington(L)
    vs.Anthony Bland(D)
    AZ: Incumbent Doug Ducey(R,term-limited)
    Mayor Marco Lopez(D)
    vs.Former news anchor Kari Lake(R)
    vs.Secretary of State Katie Hobbs(D)
    vs.State Treasurer Kimberly Yee(R)
    vs.U.S.Rep.Matt Salmon(R)
    vs.Steve Gaynor(R)
    vs.State Rep.Aaron Lieberman(D)
    vs.Jorge Rivas(R)
    CA: Incumbent Gavin Newsom(D)
    vs.S.D.Mayor Kevin_Faulconer(R)
    vs.Former Gov. nominee John Cox(R)
    vs.Kevin Paffrath(D)
    CO: Incumbent Jared Polis(D)
    vs.Mayor Greg Lopez(R)
    vs.Heidi Ganahl(R)
    CT: Incumbent Ned Lamont(D)
    vs.Bob Stefanowski(? R)
    FL: Incumbent Ron DeSantis(R)
    vs.Former Gov.Charlie Crist(D)
    vs.Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried(D)
    GA: Incumbent Brian Kemp(R)
    vs.Minority Leader Stacey Abrams(D)
    vs.Senate candidate Shane Hazel(L)
    vs.State Rep.Vernon Jones(R)
    vs.2020 candidate Kandiss Taylor(R)
    HI: Incumbent David Ige(D,term-limited)
    vs.Marissa Kerns(R)
    vs.Lt.Gov.Josh Green(D)
    vs.Vicky Cayetano(D)
    vs.Paul Morgan(R)
    IA: Incumbent Kim Reynolds(R)
    vs.Deidre DeJear(D)
    vs.State Rep.Ras Smith(D)
    ID: Incumbent Brad Little(R)
    vs.Raul Labrador(R)
    vs.Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin(R)
    vs.Ammon Bundy(R)
    vs.Ed Humphreys(R)
    IL: Incumbent J.B. Pritzker(D)
    vs.State Sen.Darren Bailey(R)
    vs.Paul Schimpf(R)
    vs.Jesse Sullivan(R)
    KS: Incumbent Laura Kelly(D)
    vs.Jeff Colyer(R)
    vs.State Sen.Derek Schmidt(R)
    vs.Chase LaPorte(R)
    Gubernatorial Debates 2022 (continued):
    MA: Incumbent Charlie Baker(R)
    vs.Lt.Gov.Karyn Polito(R)
    vs.State Rep. Geoff Diehl(R)
    vs.Harvard Professor Danielle Allen(D)
    vs.State Sen.Ben Downing(D)
    vs.State Sen.Sonia Chang-Diaz(D)
    MD: Incumbent Larry Hogan(R,term-limited)
    vs.State Rep. Robin Ficker(R)
    vs.State Rep. Peter Franchot(D)
    vs.State Del.Kelly M. Schulz(R)
    vs.Secretary John B. King(D)
    vs.Obama administration Ashwani Jain(D)
    vs.State attorney-general Doug Gansler(D)
    vs.County executive Rushern Baker(D)
    vs.Secretary Thomas Perez(D)
    vs.Wes Moore(D)
    vs.Dan Cox(R)
    ME: Incumbent Janet Mills(D)
    vs.Former Gov. Paul LePage(R)
    MI: Incumbent Gretchen Whitmer(D)
    vs.Chief James Craig(R)
    vs.Police Chief Tudor Dixon(R)
    vs.Garrett Soldano(R)
    MN: Incumbent Tim Walz(DFL)
    vs.Mayor Mike Murphy(R)
    vs.State Sen.Scott Jensen(R)
    vs.Michelle Benson(R)
    vs.Paul Gazelka(R)
    NE: Incumbent Pete Ricketts(R,term-limited)
    vs.U.S.Senator Bob Krist(R)
    vs.Chuck Herbster(R)
    vs.Jim Pillen(R)
    vs.Brett Lindstrom(R)
    vs.Carol Blood(D)
    NH: Incumbent Chris Sununu(R)
    vs.Dan Feltes(D)
    vs.Karen Testerman(R)
    NM: Incumbent Michelle Lujan Grisham(D)
    vs.Commissioner Jay Block(R)
    vs.State Rep.Rebecca Dow(R)
    NV: Incumbent Steve Sisolak(D)
    vs.A.G.Adam Laxalt(R)
    vs.North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee(R)
    vs.Dean Heller(R)
    vs.Joe Lombardo(R)
    NY: Incumbent Andrew Cuomo(D,resigned)
    vs.Acting Gov.Kathy Hochul(D)
    vs.Rob Astorino(R)
    vs.Andrew Giuliani(R)
    vs.US.Rep.Lee Zeldin(R)
    OH: Incumbent Mike DeWine(R)
    vs.Former Rep.Jim Renacci(R)
    vs.Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley(D)
    vs.Mayor John Cranley(D)
    OK: Incumbent Kevin Stitt(R)
    vs.State Sen. Ervin Yen(R)
    vs.Connie Johnson(D)
    vs.Joy Hofmeister(D)
    OR: Incumbent Kate Brown(D,term-limited)
    vs.Gov. nominee Bud Pierce(R)
    vs.Paul Romero(R)
    vs.Casey Kulla(D)
    vs.Kerry McQuisten(R)
    vs.Tina Kotek(D)
    vs.Nicholas Kristof(D)
    PA: Incumbent Tom Wolf(D,term-limited)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Lou Barletta(R)
    vs.Commissioner Joe Gale(R)
    vs.A.G.Josh Shapiro(D)
    vs.William McSwain(R)
    RI: Incumbent Gina Raimondo(D,to Cabinet)
    vs.Gov. Dan McKee(D)
    vs.Secy.Matt Brown(D)
    vs.Mayor Allan Fung(R ?)
    vs.Luis-Daniel Munoz(D)
    vs.RI Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea(D)
    vs.Seth Magainer(D)
    vs.Helena Foulkes(D)
    SC: Incumbent Henry McMaster(R)
    vs.US.Rep.Joe Cunningham(D)
    vs.State senator Mia McLeod(D)
    SD: Incumbent Kristi Noem(R)
    vs.State Rep. Billie Sutton(? D)
    TN: Incumbent Bill Lee(R)
    vs.Carnita Atwater(D)
    vs.J B Smiley(D)
    TX: Incumbent Greg Abbott(R)
    vs.Chad Prather(R)
    vs.State Sen.Don Huffines(R)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Allen West(R)
    vs.Deidre Gilbert(D)
    VT: Incumbent Phil Scott(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    WI: Incumbent Tony Evers(D)
    vs.CEO Jonathan Wichmann(R)
    vs.Rebecca Kleefisch(R)
    WY: Incumbent Mark Gordon(R)
    vs.Rex Rammell(R)
    vs.Minority Leader Chris Rothfuss(? D)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families/Children
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Infrastructure/Technology
    Jobs
    Local Issues
    Principles/Values
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    War/Iraq/Mideast
    Welfare/Poverty


    Contact info:
    Email Contact Form
    Mailing Address:
    Cannon HOB 125, Washington, DC 20515
    Official Website
    Phone number:
    (202) 225-6155
    Search for...





    Page last updated: Nov 12, 2021